NTIA seeks comments about companies participating in the BEAD program using alternative technologies. That’s because while fiber remains a priority build for NTIA, it recognizes other technologies may be less expensive and provide reliable service to remote locations. “If a provider bids to serve a home or business with an end-to-end fiber connection, and their proposal is not too expensive, then they will be prioritized in receiving funds to deploy that network,” says BEAD Program Director Evan Feinman in a blog post.
NTIA released draft policy guidance, consistent with its Notice of Funding Opportunity, that provides states and territories additional clarity as to how to consider projects using alternative technologies. After fiber, the next priority is “other reliable broadband” technologies, such as coaxial cable or licensed fixed wireless. These are prioritized above “alternative” tech.
In the hardest-to-reach locations, states can choose technologies such as unlicensed fixed wireless (uFWA) and low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite broadband service that meet the BEAD speed and latency requirements. The proposed guidance describes how funding can be used to support alternative tech projects.
WISPA – Broadband Without Boundaries, praised NTIA’s willingness to engage with stakeholders to fine-tune the details. “The expense and lag to deployment of fiber have caused states to recognize the need for more flexibility in the program, a view WISPA shares,” said WISPA State Advocacy Manager Steve Schwerbel. “Alternative technologies can cost-effectively, rapidly, and reliably go where fiber economically cannot. NTIA’s recognition that areas where uFWA and LEOs are already providing service and areas funded by government programs should be off the table for BEAD is a welcome instruction that states cannot afford wasteful overbuilding.”
Comments are due by 11:59 p.m. ET on September 10, and should be sent to: [email protected].
By Leslie Stimson, Inside Towers Washington Bureau Chief
Reader Interactions