O’Rielly: Many C-band Decisions Are ‘TBD’

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Many questions remain up in the air regarding re-purposing of a portion of the C-band spectrum for future wireless use. Chief among the issues the FCC is wrestling with is how much of the 500 MHz to re-purpose and how to ensure incumbent users are not stuck with the repacking bill.

FCC Commissioner Michael O’Rielly says he’d likely support repurposing, “somewhere” between 200 to 300 MHz of C-band initially. “I’d like to get as much as possible. Speed is important to me,” he told Inside Towers at Wireless Connect last week. Maybe after a first round, opening a second portion of spectrum for repurposing might be possible, he suggested. “Those are decisions to be made still,” O’Rielly said.

Incumbent users such as small cable operators and broadcasters have made a “compelling” case as to why all 500 MHz can’t be converted for wireless use, according to the Commissioner. “There are ‘contractees’ who have problems either going to fiber or other satellite services,” he said. That’s part of why the agency is wrestling with how much spectrum needs to be preserved for incumbents.

O’Rielly recently told gatherings of broadcasters and small cablecos their concerns would be taken care of “as long as you don’t get greedy,” meaning determining the ultimate cost of exiting or relocating from the lower part of the band to the upper part. He likened it to the broadcast incentive auction, in which Congress authorized the FCC to reimburse broadcasters moving to another channel, subject to rules about monetary reimbursements. (In a subsequent issue, we’ll review potential repack costs.)

By Leslie Stimson, Inside TowersWashington Bureau Chief
April 12, 2019

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.